By Mr. Jacob Bundrick Will Issue 3 bring jobs or bankruptcy taxes? Issue 3 proposes to allow local governments to appropriate tax dollars directly to private companies for economic development projects and to pay private organizations for economic development consulting work. Issue 3 would also expand the type of projects for which local debt can […]
financial incentives
Issue 3: Unleashing Economic Development Bonds
By Dr. Jeremy Horpedahl and Mr. Jacob Bundrick Issue 3 is a complicated ballot measure. The bill runs 9 pages of legal text and it amends at least six sections of the Arkansas Constitution. No wonder voters are confused! In this blog post, we will discuss the benefits and costs of Issue 3’s major […]
Why Financial Incentives for Businesses Put Taxpayers at Risk
By Mr. Jacob Bundrick Supporters of financial incentives for businesses argue that incentives are designed to protect the taxpayers who pay for them. Tax incentives generally pay out only after a company makes a business investment. An example is the tax credit for 1 percent of payroll that Elyxor will receive for creating 45 jobs […]
How Tax Breaks and Subsidies Cost You and the Government Money
By Mr. Jacob Bundrick Proponents of financial incentives for business argue that tax breaks and subsidies don’t create costs to the state’s budget. Advocates reason that if Arkansas forgoes taxing a firm in some way, and that firm truly would not have located in the state without the tax break, there is no cost to […]