• Skip to content
  • Skip to footer
  • Skip to content
  • Skip to navigation
  • Skip to footer
University of Central Arkansas Logo

Arkansas Center for Research in Economics

Menu
  • UCA Home
  • Admissions
  • Academics
  • Campus Life
  • Athletics
  • Connect
  • About UCA
  • A to Z
  • Home
  • Our People
  • Research Areas
    • K-12 Education
    • Labor Market Regulation
    • Property Rights
    • Targeted Incentives
    • Taxes and Spending
    • Transparency
  • Student Programs
    • Undergraduate Research Fellows
    • Reading Group
  • Events
    • Speaker Series
    • Colloquia
  • Blog
  • K-12 Resources
    • Economics Nobel Prize Lecture Series
  • Contact Us
  • Annual Reports & Media

Denial of Economic Opportunities: The Case of Barber Licensing

By Caleb Taylor

What was the motivation and reasoning behind the original state regulation of barbers in Arkansas? 

ACRE Research Fellow Tanner Corley explored this question and more in an op-ed, “Hairy regulations,” published in the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette on December 11.

According to Corley, Arkansas barbers were able to appeal to fears of unsanitary barber shops in order to pass a 1937 Arkansas barber law that required six months of barber practice or 1,000 hours in training. 

Corley writes: 

When the barbers used licensing laws to seek better wages and less competition, they were effectively denying some people the opportunity to make a living. This is how licensing laws work. Once implemented, it outlaws all unlicensed workers from practicing their trade.”

Corley is from Bismarck, Arkansas. He is a senior with a double major in History and Political Science. After graduating he plans to attend graduate school for history.

Corley’s paper, “Barber Licensing in Arkansas: Public Health or Private Gain” co-authored with former ACRE Scholar-in-Residence Dr. Marcus Witcher in the Winter 2021 edition of Cato Journal also explores the history of barber licensing in Arkansas.

Corley and Witcher write:

While other scholars have investigated the consequences of such legislation, we believe more attention should be paid to the origins of occupational licensing laws. Our case study demonstrates that barbers in Arkansas captured the regulatory apparatus and used it to decrease competition in their profession and raise their wages. They also grandfathered themselves in to avoid the newly established requirements to receive a license. Finally, once the Barber Board was created, only barbers sat on the board and many of them engaged in rent seeking to secure positions both on the board and as inspectors. The creation of barber licensure in Arkansas was not established to protect public health but for private gain. Accordingly, we should be skeptical of occupations today that seek licensing for the “public good.”

For a broader look at occupational licensing in Arkansas, check out  ACRE Economic Policy Analyst Alex Kanode’s policy statement, “Occupational Licensing and Arkansas’s Act 600”, here. 

For more on this topic, check out our labor market regulation research page.

Posted in: Regulation on January 27, 2021 Tagged: Arkansas, occupational licensing

Footer

Contact Us

University of Central Arkansas
College of Business
201 Donaghey Avenue
Conway, Arkansas 72035
E-mail: acre@uca.edu

Disclaimer

The views and opinions expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the University of Central Arkansas nor are they endorsed by the University of Central Arkansas.

ACRE does not campaign for, promote, advocate, or support specific political parties or political candidates.

Follow Us!

Follow us on social media:

Facebook: Arkansas Center for Research in Economics ACRE
YouTube: Arkansas Center for Research in Economics
Twitter: @acre_uca

University of Central Arkansas · 201 Donaghey Ave., Conway, AR 72035 · (501) 450-5000
UCA is accredited by the Higher Learning Commission.
Report Web Accessibility Issue | Concerned About a Student? | Privacy
Copyright © 2026 · All Rights Reserved