• Lee, K. R., Dague, T. D., Sobel, K. V., Paternoster, N. J., & Puri, A. M. (2021). Set size and ensemble perception of numerical value. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics.
• Sobel, K. V., Puri, A. M., & York, A. K. (2020). Visual search inverts the classic Stroop asymmetry. Acta Psychologica, 205, 103054.
• Lee, K., Sobel, K. V., York, A. K., & Puri, A. M. (2018). Dissociating parallel and serial processing of numerical value. Journal of Numerical Cognition, 4, 360-379.
• Sobel, K. V., & Puri, A. M. (2018). Size congruity influences visual search via the target template. Acta Psychologica, 183, 66-74.
• Wilson, K., & Sobel, K. V. (2018). The size congruity effect in visual search: Further evidence for late interaction. Psi Chi Journal of Psychological Research, 23, 311-319.
• Hobson, L., & Sobel, K. V. (2017). Memory for missing parts of witnessed events. Psi Chi Journal of Psychological Research, 22, 64-71.
• Sobel, K. V., Puri, A. M., Faulkenberry, T. J., & Dague, T. D. (2017). Visual search for conjunctions of physical and numerical size shows that they are processed independently. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 43, 444-453.
• Sobel, K. V., Puri, A. M., & Faulkenberry, T. J. (2016). Bottom-up and top-down attentional contributions to the size congruity effect. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 78, 1324-1336.
•  Sobel, K. V., Puri, A. M., & Hogan, J. (2015). Target grouping in visual search for multiple digits. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 77, 67-77.

 Papers published with students in the undergraduate Journal of Psychological Inquiry. 

• www.psychinquiry.org
• Dague, T. D., & Sobel, K. V. (2019). Using visual search to investigate whether cognition directly affects perception. Journal of Psychological Inquiry, 23 (2), 15-20.
• Hahn, E., & Sobel, K. V. (2019). Children’s false memories in visual context. Journal of Psychological Inquiry, 23 (1), 25-29.
• Francis, T. N., Nolan, S. S., Schichtl, K. B., & Sobel, K. V. (2018). Do people remember the judgments they make? Journal of Psychological Inquiry, 22 (1), 36-41.
• Downs, H. B., Hale, J., & Sobel, K. V. (2016). Why do people justify choices they had not actually made? Journal of Psychological Inquiry, 21 (1), 20-24.
• Halligan, J., & Sobel, K. V. (2016). Automaticity of numerical processing. Journal of Psychological Inquiry, 21 (2), 44-50.
• Hufstedler, A., & Sobel, K. V. (2016). Does the mere expectation of a cell phone call occupy working memory? Journal of Psychological Inquiry, 21 (2), 6-14.
•  Ilic, I., & Sobel, K. V. (2016). Why does visually ambiguous motion reverse? Journal of Psychological Inquiry, 21 (1), 40-48.
• Phillips, N. S., & Sobel, K. V. (2016). A memento to remember you by. Journal of Psychological Inquiry, 21 (2), 64-70.
• Downs, H. B., & Sobel, K. V. (2015). A new explanation of choice blindness in terms of visual short-term memory. Journal of Psychological Inquiry, 20 (1), 6-10.
• Hoffman, H., Ozanich, C., & Sobel, K. V. (2014). Psychopathy, cognitive dissonance, and altruism as portrayed in the television show Dexter. Journal of Psychological Inquiry, 19 (2), 31-37.
•  Hogan, J., & Sobel, K. V. (2014). Conceptual and perceptual features in guided visual search. Journal of Psychological Inquiry, 19 (1), 5-11.

Other Publications:

• Sobel, K. V. (2010). Using the drawing and animation tools in PowerPoint to build your own visual perception demonstrations. Office of Teaching Resources in Psychology.
• Sobel, K. V., Pickard, M. D., & Acklin, W. T. (2009). Using feature preview to investigate the roles of top-down and bottom-up processing in conjunction search. Acta Psychologica, 132, 22-30.
• Sobel, K. V., Gerrie, M. P., Poole, B. J. , & Kane, M. J. (2007). Individual differences in working memory capacity and visual search: the roles of top-down and bottom-up processing. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14, 840-845.
• Blake, R., Tadin, D., Sobel, K. V., Chong, S. C. & Raissian, T. (2006). Visual adaptation is weakend when visual awareness is abolished. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 103, 4783-4788.
• Blake, R., Sobel, K. V. & James, T. W. (2004). Neural synergy between seeing and touch. Psychological Science, 15, 397-402.
• Sobel, K. V., & Blake, R. (2003). Subjective contours and binocular rivalry suppression. Vision Research, 43, 1533-1540.
• Blake, R., Sobel, K. V., & Gilroy, L. (2003). Visual motion retards alternation between conflicting perceptual interpretations. Neuron, 39, 869-878.
• Sobel, K. V., & Blake, R. (2002). How context influences predominance during binocular rivalry. Perception, 31, 813-824.
• Sobel, K. V., & Cave, K. R. (2002). Roles of strategy and salience in conjunction search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 28, 1055-1070.